Are Destinations Overlooking Their Most Valuable Visitors?

Table of Contents

Most destinations are obsessed with visitor numbers.

More arrivals. More overnight stays. More bookings.

But what if one of the most valuable visitor segments isn’t staying for 2-5 days, but for 30, 60, or even 90 days?

After several years of running workations and coliving experiences across Europe, I’ve become increasingly convinced that destinations often underestimate the value of long-stay remote workers and digital nomads.

Not because they spend the most money per day.

But because they create a different kind of impact.

The Tourism Industry’s Obsession with Short Stays

Traditional tourism metrics tend to reward volume.

A destination welcomes 10,000 visitors for a weekend festival and celebrates the result. Hotels are full. Restaurants are busy. Attractions see a surge in visitors.

And that’s great.

However, these visitors are also highly seasonal, often concentrated around a few peak periods, and leave almost as quickly as they arrive.

Many destinations are now facing challenges linked to seasonality:

Empty accommodations outside peak periods
Businesses struggling during shoulder seasons
Difficulty retaining local services year-round
Pressure on infrastructure during peak periods
Limited economic activity outside tourism hotspots

As a result, many towns and regions are looking for more sustainable tourism models.

This is where long-stay visitors become interesting.

A Different Type of Visitor

When someone spends one week somewhere, they are a tourist.

When someone spends two or three months somewhere, they start behaving more like a temporary resident.

They buy groceries instead of eating every meal out.

They become regular customers at cafés.

They use local gyms.

They visit the local bakery every morning.

They participate in community events.

They get to know local business owners.

They invite friends and family to visit.

They often return.

In many ways, they integrate into the local ecosystem rather than simply consuming it.

This creates a different kind of economic impact—one that is less visible but often more sustainable.

What We Observe Through Hubs Workations

Through Hubs, we’ve welcomed remote workers in destinations ranging from the Swiss Alps to Norway, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and beyond.

One pattern appears repeatedly.

The longer participants stay, the stronger their connection with the destination becomes.

At first, they arrive as visitors.

A few weeks later, they have favorite cafés.

After a month, they know local hiking trails, restaurants, and shop owners.

By the end of their stay, many are actively recommending the destination to friends, family, colleagues, and their online communities.

Some even return multiple times.

Others decide to spend part of every year there.

In certain cases, participants have gone on to rent apartments locally, buy property, launch projects, or develop long-term relationships with the destination.

This kind of engagement rarely happens during a typical weekend trip.

The Economic Value Isn’t Just Accommodation

A common mistake is to evaluate long-stay visitors solely through accommodation revenue.

Yes, accommodation matters.

But the wider economic impact can be substantial.

A remote worker staying for 60 days may:

Rent accommodation
Use coworking facilities
Eat at restaurants regularly
Shop locally
Use public transport
Join sports clubs
Participate in cultural activities
Bring visiting friends or family
Generate online visibility for the destination

When multiplied across dozens or hundreds of visitors, this creates meaningful economic activity spread throughout the local economy.

Importantly, this spending often occurs during periods when tourism demand would otherwise be lower.

Seasonality: The Real Opportunity

For many destinations, especially mountain regions, smaller towns, and rural areas, seasonality remains one of the biggest challenges.

Hotels may be full in July and August.

Ski resorts may thrive during winter holidays.

But what happens in between?

Long-stay remote workers can help fill some of these gaps.

Unlike traditional tourists, they are often less dependent on school holidays or peak tourism seasons.

They choose destinations based on:

Quality of life
Internet connectivity
Housing availability
Community
Nature
Affordability
Work environment

This means they can travel during periods when destinations have available capacity.

For local businesses, this creates a more stable customer base throughout the year.

Community Matters More Than People Think

One aspect that is often overlooked is community.

Many destinations invest heavily in infrastructure:

Coworking spaces
High-speed internet
Accommodation
Transportation

These are important.

But community is frequently what transforms a destination from a place people visit into a place people return to.

Remote workers often seek:

Social connections
Networking opportunities
Shared experiences
Local integration

Destinations that facilitate these elements tend to perform much better in attracting long-stay visitors.

People rarely remember a destination because of its Wi-Fi speed alone.

They remember the people they met there.

Quality Over Quantity

This isn’t an argument against traditional tourism.

Destinations need visitors of all types.

Weekend travelers, families, business travelers, adventure tourists, and remote workers all contribute to the local economy.

However, I believe more destinations should start asking a simple question:

Are we measuring the right things?

Instead of focusing exclusively on visitor numbers, perhaps we should also look at:

Length of stay
Off-season occupancy
Repeat visitation
Local economic integration
Community participation
Long-term destination advocacy

A visitor who stays 60 days and becomes an ambassador for a destination may ultimately generate more long-term value than several short-term visitors who never return.